M'KIM
v.
VOORHIES

U.S. | 1812-03-14
fresent....All the Judges., All the Judges being present,
7 Cranch 279 Supreme Court of the United States (1812) Caution
Also reported at: 3 L. Ed. 342 · 1812 U.S. LEXIS 398 · SCDB 1812-040
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
Todd, J.

Todd, J.

stated the opinion of the Court to be; that the State Court liad no jurisdiction to enjoin a judgment of the Circuit Court pf the United ' States; and that the Court below should be ordered to issue, the writ of habere facias.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Donovan v. City OF Dallas, 377 U.S. 408 (U.S. 1964)
    …which the Court relies deals with, or in any way negatives, the power of a state court to enjoin federal litigation in circumstances such as those involved here. None of them was concerned with vexatious litigation. The issue in McKim v. Voorhies, 7 Cranch 279 (ante, p. 412, note 9), was whether a state court could stay proceedings [*551] on a federal court’s judgment which had already-been rendered when the state court acquired jurisdiction and which, therefore, involved no element of harassment at all.…
    1 / 3
  • Providence & NEW York S.S. Co. v. Hill Mfg. Co., 109 U.S. 578 (U.S. 1883)
  • Claflin v. Houseman, 93 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1876)

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw