LIVINGSTON
v.
DORGENOIS
LIVINGSTON
DORGENOIS
7 Cranch 577
Supreme Court of the United States (1813)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 3 L. Ed. 444 · 1813 U.S. LEXIS 456 · SCDB 1813-043
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bishop v. Chillingworth, 114 Fla. 286 (Fla. 1934)…late court’s judicial power ultimately to review and correct on a writ of error taken to the inferior court’s judgment. In cases where so employed, a writ of mandamus is in the nature. of a procedendo. Livingston v. Dorgenois, 7 Cranch (U. S.) *576, 3 L. Ed. 444; Ex Parte Bradstreet, 7 Peters (U. S.) 634, 8 L. Ed. 810; New York Fire & Life. Ins. Co. v. Wilson’s Heirs, [*293] 8 Peters (U. S.) 291, 8 L. Ed. 949; In re United States, 194 U. S. 194, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 629, 48 L. Ed. 931; Ex Parte Virginia, 100 U.…
-
Ex parte Simons, 247 U.S. 231 (U.S. 1918)
-
Ex parte, 13 Pet. 230 (U.S. 1839)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence