FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA

v.

REDICK

U.S. | 1884-01-21

110 U.S. 224 Supreme Court of the United States (1884) Positive Treatment

Also reported at: 28 L. Ed. 124 · 3 S. Ct. 640 · 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1684 · SCDB 1883-131

Cited by 13 cases

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.

This motion is granted on the authority of Thompson v. Butler, 95 U. S. 694, and Alabama Gold Life Insurance Company v. Nichols, 109 U. S. 232.

Dismissed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Pac. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. O'Connor, 128 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1888)

…he action of the Circuit Court to have been in abuse of its discretion, and as the judgment as it stands is for $5000 only, the motion to dismiss must be granted. Ala. Gold Life Ins. Co. v. Nichols, 109 U. S. 232; First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Redick, 110 U. S. 224; Thompson v. Butler, 95 U. S. 694. Writ of error dismissed.…
Clark v. Sidway, 142 U.S. 682 (U.S. 1892)
Grant Cnty. Deposit Bank v. McCAMPBELL, 194 F.2d 469 (6th Cir. 1952)

…artnership account arising out of a partnership transaction and is an indispensable party to an action seeking its enforcement. Snodgrass v. Broadwell, 12 Ky. 353, 2 Litt. 353, 356-357; Vinal v. West Virginia Oil & Land Co., 110 U.S. 215, 4 S.Ct. 4, 28 L.Ed. 124; City of Orlando v. Murphy, 5 Cir., 77 F. 2d 702, 703; Minez v. Merrill, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 43 F. 2d 201; .Chame v. Essex Chair Co., D.C. 92 F.Supp. 164. Appellees, however, contend that the disclaimer by Brooks of his in- . terest in the claim changed…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw