GREENWOOD & OTHERS

v.

RANDALL

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Zirot v. Gilmer, 336 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
  …me they were used by the receivers appointed by the state court and for six months before was proper. The court did not allow it in this case, apparently because Schall recovered his railroad cars anyway; Burnham v. Bowen, 111 U.S. 776, 4 S.Ct. 675, 28 L.Ed. 596 (1884) (This also involved a railroad foreclosure. The court allowed payment by the receiver out of the current income for coal delivered prior to the appointment of the receiver. The rationale was that the payment of coal was for current expenses.…
• Rector v. United States, 20 F.2d 845 (8th Cir. 1927)
  …Railroad Co., 1 Wall. 655 [17 L. Ed. 673]; Forgay v. Conrad, 6 How. 201 [12 L. Ed. 404]; Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U. S. 235 [25 L. Ed. 339]; Williams v. Morgan, 111 U. S. 684 [4 S. Ct. 638, 28 L. Ed. 559]; Burnham v. Bowen, 111 U. S. 776 [4 S. Ct. 675, 28 L. Ed. 596]. “The question in such cases is not whether the order complained of is of a character decisive of questions that the parties are entitled to have reviewed in the appellate eourt, but whether the order or decree is of that final nature which alone…
• Berthold-Jennings Lumber Co. v. ST. Louis, 80 F.2d 32 (8th Cir. 1935)
  …unpaid expenses incurred within six months prior to the appointment of the receivers. * * * The cases in which this time limit was not observed are few in number and exceptional in character. See Burnham v. Bowen. 111 U.S. 776, 780-783, 4 S.Ct. 675, 28 L.Ed. 596; Union Trust Co. v. Morrison, 125 U.S. 591, 8 S. Ct. 1004, 31 L.Ed. 825. In no ease which has come to our attention'has the doctrine been applied to liabilities which, like those here in question, accrued many years before the receivership began.”…