STONE & OTHERS
v.
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY

U.S. | 1885-10-01
Mr. Justice Harlan also dissented for the reasons expressed in his' dissent in the same case, ante, 331., Mr. Justice Blatohford did not sit in this case or take any part in its decision.
116 U.S. 347 Supreme Court of the United States (1885) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 29 L. Ed. 650 · 6 S. Ct. 348 · 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1765 · SCDB 1885-095
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Waite

Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court. This suit, like, that of Stone v. The Farmers’ Loan and Trust Co., just decided, ante, 307, was brought to restrain the railroad commission from enforcing the railroad supervision act of Mississippi against a Corporation operating a railroad in that State. The railroad in Mississippi forms part of a line from New Orleans through Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Kentucky to a point on the Ohio River opposite Cairo, Illinois, where it connects with the Illinois Central Railroad, extending to Chicago. The entire line is now owned by the New Orleans, St. Louis and Chicago Railroad Company, a corporation formed by the consolidation of the several corporations created by the different States through which the road runs, for the purpose of securing its construction and operation for inter-state traffic, as well as for transportation within the limits of the several States.

The whole road from Cairo to New Orleans has been leased to the Illinois Central Railroad Company, an Illinois corporation, and is now operated by that company, much the largest part of its business being of an inter-state character. The Mississippi charter, under which the road is now owned and operated in that State, provides:

“ That the president and directors be, and they are hereby, authorized to adopt and establish such a tariff of charges for the transportation of persons and property as they may think proper, and the same to alter and change at pleasure.”

This is now part of the charter of the consolidated company in Mississippi. ' In all other respects the material facts in this case are the same as those in that just decided. Relief is also asked on the same grounds. The court below granted the injunction prayed for, and this appeal was taken for a review of a decree to that effect.

This case comes clearly within the rulings in the other. There is nothing here any more than there to show an intention by Mississippi to exempt the corporation in that State from proper legislative control, and the Illinois corporation, by going into Mississippi to operate a railroad there, subjected itself to such local legislation as-would have been applicable to the corporation owning the road, if no lease had been made. As a corporation of another State, it has no other privileges in Mississippi than such as belong to the corporation whose road it runs.

The decree of the Circuit Court is reversed on the authority of Stone v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Co., and the cause is remanded, with directions to dismiss the bill.

Dissent
Mr. Justice Field

Mr. Justice Field dissented from the opinion of the court and the judgment in this case for the reasons expressed in.his dissent in Stone v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Co., ante, 342.

Mr. Justice Harlan also dissented for the reasons expressed in his' dissent in the same case, ante, 331.

Mr. Justice Blatohford did not sit in this case or take any part in its decision.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …& St. Peter R. Co. v. Blake, 94 U. S. 180; Stone v. Wisconsin, 94 U. S. 181; Ruggles v. Illinois, 108 U. S. 536; Illinois Central R. Co. v. Illinois, 108 U. S. 541; Stone v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co., 116 U. S. 307; Stone v. Illinois Central R. Co., 116 U. S. 347; Stone v. New Orleans & Northeastern R. Co., 116 U. S. 352; Dow v. Beidelman, 125 U. S. 680; Charlotte, C. & A. R. Co. v. Gibbes, 142 U. S. 386; Chicago & Grand Trunk R. Co. v. Wellman, 143 U. S. 339; Pearsall v. Great Northern R. Co., 161 U. S. 646…
  • Budd v. NEW York, 143 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1892)
    …Peter Railroad v. Blake, 94 U. S. 180; Stone v. Wisconsin, 94 U. S. 181; Ruggles v. Illinois, 108 U. S. 526; Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois, 108 U. S. 541; Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 116 U. S. 307; Stone v. Illinois Central Railroad, 116 U. S. 347; and Stone v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad, 116 U. S. 352, as recognizing the doctrine that the legislature may itself fix a maximum beyond which any charge would be unreasonable, in respect to services rendered in a public employment,- or fo…
  • DOW v. Reidelman, 125 U.S. 680 (U.S. 1888)
    …two. dissenting Justices were grounded upon the provisions of the charter, and upon its not having been expressly made subject to alteration'or repeal by the legislature.- The cases,, decided at the same time, of Stone v. Illinois Central Railroad, 116 U. S. 347, and Stone v. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad, 116 U. S, 352, were substantially similar. As applied to freights and fares for transportation not extending beyond the limits of the State by which the railroad company-' is incorporated, the- auth…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw