CORE & ANOTHER
v.
VINAL

U.S. | 1886-03-22
117 U.S. 347 Supreme Court of the United States (1886) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 29 L. Ed. 912 · 6 S. Ct. 767 · 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1846 · SCDB 1885-178
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Waite

Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.

The order remanding this cause is affirmed. The petition for removal was not filed in time and the suit was not removable. Pirie v. Tvedt, 115 U. S. 41; Sloane v. Anderson, ante 275, decided at this term.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ill. Cent. R.R. Co. v. Sheegog, 215 U.S. 308 (U.S. 1909)
  • Little & Others v. Giles & Another, 118 U.S. 596 (U.S. 1886)
    …Ide, 114 U. S. 52; Farmington v. Pillsbury, 114 U. S. 138; Pirie v. Tvedt, 115 U. S. 41; Crump v. Thurber, 115 U. S. 56; Starin v. New York, 115 U. S. 248; Sloan v. Anderson, 117 U. S. 278; Insurance Co. v. Huntington, 117 U. S. 280; Core v. Vinal, 117 U. S. 347; Mining Co. v. Canal Co., 118 U. S. 264. In Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Ide, the suit was originally brought by Ide in the Supreme Court of New York against several railroad companies forming a continuous line, including the plaintiff in…
  • Fisk v. Henarie, 142 U.S. 459 (U.S. 1892)

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw