LEMUEL ANDERSON, PETITIONER,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Diana v. Elissa Bentsen, 677 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …ana Estates, Inc. sell real estate it owns in the event the estate is unable to sell its stock in the corporation poses separate questions, of the kind adverted to in In re Estate of Gettinger, 157 So. 2d 692, 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963) cert. dismissed, 165 So. 2d 757 (Fla.1964): [T]o include in a decedent’s estate the assets of a corporation substantially owned by him would produce far reaching results. It would ignore the rights and interests of all other stockholders in the corporation. The creditors of the c…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Swartz v. Russell, 481 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …ast and David or ECF. In addition, while one-third of the shares of East Coast is an asset of the estate (and the administrator is free to vote those shares), the assets used in the seafood business are not estate assets. See Gettinger v. Gettinger, 165 So. 2d 757 (Fla.1964). Therefore, the dispute over those assets must be tried, if at all, between the appropriate parties and in the appropriate forum. . Should the probate court find that ECF is wrongfully in possession it should order ECF, and not David, to…
• Bankatlantic v. Est. OF Richard Glatzer, 61 So. 3d 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
  …te was apparently entitled to take possession of the professional association stock held by the doctor at his death,1 no such conclusion extended to the association’s funds on deposit in the corporate name at BankAtlantic. In Gettinger v. Gettinger, 165 So. 2d 757 (Fla.1964), the Supreme Court of Florida held that “the affairs of a corporation, even though substantially owned by a decedent, cannot be administered by decedent’s executor as assets of the decedent’s estate.” In this case, “substantially” is 100%…