RICE

v.

UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1887-03-07

122 U.S. 611 Supreme Court of the United States (1887) Caution

Also reported at: 30 L. Ed. 793 · 7 S. Ct. 1377 · 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2141 · SCDB 1886-170

Cited by 16 cases

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice

Waite announced that the judgment of the Court of Claims was

Affirmed by a divided comet.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Sage v. United States, 250 U.S. 33 (U.S. 1919)
United States Ex rel. Louisville Cement Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 246 U.S. 638 (U.S. 1918)

…ime when a cause of action accrues had been settled by repeated decisions of this court to be when a suit may first be legally instituted upon it (Amy v. Dubuque, 98 U. S. 470, 474; United States v. Taylor, 104 U. S. 216, 222; Rice v. United States, 122 U. S. 611, 617) and, since no clearly controlling language to the contrary is used, it must be assumed that Congress intended that this familar expression should be given the well understood meaning which had been given to it by this court. We therefore concl…
United States v. Louisiana, 123 U.S. 32 (U.S. 1887)

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw