INLAND AND SEABOARD COASTING COMPANY
v.
HALL

U.S. | 1888-01-09
124 U.S. 121 Supreme Court of the United States (1888) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 31 L. Ed. 369 · 8 S. Ct. 397 · 1888 U.S. LEXIS 1841 · SCDB 1887-089
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
MR. Chief Justice Waite

MR. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.

- This judgment is reversed on the authority of Metropolitan Railroad Co. v. Moore, 121 U. S. 558, and the cause remanded 'with directions to take further proceedings therein in accordance with the opinion in that case, that is to say, to consider the appeal from the order at,special term denying the motion of the Inland and Seaboard Coasting Company for a new trial, made on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

Reversed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re United Toledo Co. Thos. S. Aubry Co. v. United Toledo Co., 152 F.2d 210 (6th Cir. 1945)
    …., 6 Cir., 125 F. 2d 446. The purchaser at a judicial sale is protected by the order or decree of the court, and he need not look beyond the decree and the jurisdiction of the court. Boyd v. Wyley, C.C., 18 F. 353, affirmed 124 U.S. 98, 8 S.Ct. 364, 31 L.Ed. 369. “The bankruptcy sale at which appellant bought was a judi;ial sale, and appellant was clearly hound by the conditions of the order of sale and confirmation and the conveyance made pursuant thereto.” United Brick & Tile Co. v. McKissick, 8 Cir., 51…
  • Perryman v. Woodward, 238 U.S. 148 (U.S. 1915)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw