GLEN
v.
FANT
GLEN
FANT
124 U.S. 123
Supreme Court of the United States (1888)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 31 L. Ed. 352 · 8 S. Ct. 398 · 1888 U.S. LEXIS 1842 · SCDB 1887-090
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.
This motion is denied. While the stipulation binds the parties to submit the cause without oral argument; there is nothing which requires this to be done at any particular time. Tts terms will be fulfilled if the submission is made when the case is reached in its order. As no reference is made to Rule. 20, we cannot apply that rule to the case on the suggestion of one of the parties against the protest of the other. Denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Minn. Mining & MFG. Co. v. COE, 99 F.2d 986 (D.C. Cir. 1938)…ses cited in notes 9 and 12 supra, and see, also, Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37, 41, 23 L.Ed. 200; Pennsylvania R. R. v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co., 110 U.S. 490, 494, 4 S.Ct. 220, 28 L. Ed. 222; Dreyfus v. Searle, 124 U.S. 60, 64, 8 S.Ct. 390, 31 L.Ed. 352; Concrete Appliances Co. v. Gomery, 269 U.S. 177, 184, 185, 46 S.Ct. 42, 45, 70 L.Ed. 222; Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp., 294 U.S. 464, 473, 55 S.Ct. 449, 79 L.Ed. 997; Pick v. Coe, Nos. 6988 and 6989, — App.D.C. —, 99 F. 2d 985…
-
Novocol Chem. MFG. Co., Inc. v. Powers & Anderson Dental Co., Inc., 128 F.2d 904 (4th Cir. 1942)…e. See Walker on Patents (6th Ed.) Sect. 76, [*908] and cases there cited, including King v. Gallun, 109 U.S. 99, 3 S.Ct. 85, 27 L.Ed. 870; Miller v. Foree, 116 U.S. 22, 27, 6 S.Ct. 204, 29 L.Ed. 552; Dreyfus v. Searle, 124 U.S. 60, 63, 8 S.Ct. 390, 31 L.Ed. 352; Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37, 23 L.Ed. 200; Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Mfg. Co., 177 U.S. 485, 491, 20 S.Ct. 708, 44 L.Ed. 856. In the instant case the patentee is in the situation described in Crescent Brewing Co. v. Gottfried, 128 U.S. 158, 169, 9…1 / 2