IN RE ROYALL
IN RE ROYALL
125 U.S. 696
Supreme Court of the United States (1888)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 31 L. Ed. 855 · 8 S. Ct. 1392 · SCDB 1887-158 · 1888 U.S. LEXIS 1957
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.
This motion is denied. It does not appear that, the petitioner has ever applied t-o the supreme court of appeals of Yirginia to carry the mandate of this court into effect.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Henry v. Henkel, 235 U.S. 219 (U.S. 1914)…present case, but because of the fact that the writ was there.denied even though the statute, on which the charge was based, was ultimately held to be void. Royall v. Virginia, 116 U. S. 572, 579, 583; Same v. Same, 121 U. S. 102, 104; In re Royall, 125 U. S. 696. The cases cited do not, of course, lead to the conclusion that a citizen can be held in custody or removed for trial where there was no provision of the common law or statute making an offense of the acts charged. In. such case the committing cour…