UNITED STATES EX REL. DUNLAP
v.
BLACK, COMMISSIONER OF PENSIONS; UNITED STATES EX REL. ROSE V. SAME; UNITED STATES EX REL. MILLER V. SAME
UNITED STATES EX REL. DUNLAP
BLACK, COMMISSIONER OF PENSIONS; UNITED STATES EX REL. ROSE V. SAME; UNITED STATES EX REL. MILLER V. SAME
128 U.S. 40
Supreme Court of the United States (1888)
Caution
Also reported at: 32 L. Ed. 354 · 9 S. Ct. 12 · 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2196 · SCDB 1888-010
Cited by 125 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Beadley delivered the opinion of the court.
These cases were argued together, but it will be convenient to consider them separately, in the order in which they stand on the docket.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (45 total)
-
Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Comm. v. McGRATH, 341 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1951)…n cannot be invoked to prevent Congress from authorizing disbursements on the ex parte determination of an administrative officer that prescribed conditions are met. United States v. Babcock, 250 U. S. 328; cf. United States ex rel. Dunlap v. Black, 128 U. S. 40. The importation of goods is a privilege which, if Congress clearly so directs, may likewise be conditioned on ex parte findings. Buttfield v. Stranahan, 192 U. S. 470; cf. Hilton v. Merritt, 110 U. S. 97. Only by a close division of the Court was…
-
Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co., 310 U.S. 113 (U.S. 1940)…1 U. S. 207; Ellis v. United States, 206 U. S. 246; Heim v. McCall, 239 U. S. 175; cf. Federal Trade Commission v. Raymond Co., 263 U. S. 565. Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. United States, 288 U. S. 294, 319, 320. United States ex rel. Dunlap v. Black, 128 U. S. 40, 48; cf. Butte, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. United States, 290 U. S. 127, 136, 142, 143. House Report No. 2946, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. Cf. Ex parte Williams, 277 U. S. 267, 269, 272; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United States, 277 U. S. 172, 180. Cf. General…
-
Noble v. Union River Logging R.R. Co., 147 U.S. 165 (U.S. 1893)…tes v. Guthrie, 17 How. 284; United States v. The Commissioner, 5 Wall. 563; Gaines v. Thompson, 7 Wall. 347; The Secretary v. McGarrahan, 9 Wall. 298; United States v. Schurz, 102 U. S. 378; Butterworth v. Hoe, 112 U. S. 50; United States v. Black, 128 U. S. 40. In all these cases the distinction between judicial and ministerial acts is commented upon and enforced. We have no doubt the principle of these decisions applies to a case wherein it is contended that the act of the Head of a Department, under an…
Previewing 3 of 45 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence