THE UNITED STATES

v.

JOB L. BARBER

Citator

Cited By

• Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp., 167 F.2d 9 (2d Cir. 1948)
  …ohen v. Randall, 2 Cir., 137 F. 2d 441 at 444; Hughes v. Roosevelt, 2 Cir., 107 F. 2d 901, 903; Fyfe v. Pan Atlantic S. S. Corp., 2 Cir., 114 F. 2d 72, 75; The S. S. Nea Hellis, 2 Cir., 116 F. 2d 803, 804. See, e.g., The Adeline, 9 Cranch 244, 284, 3 L.Ed. 719’; The Divina Pastora; 4 Wheat, 52, 64-65, 4 L.Ed. 512; Hughes v. Roosevelt, 2 Cir., 107 F. 2d 901, 903; Fyfe v. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp., 2 Cir., 114 F. 2d 72, 75; 2 Benedict, Admiralty, 6th Ed. § 355. Admiralty has always been more liberal in the…
• Dowling v. Isthmian S. S. Corp., 184 F.2d 758 (3d Cir. 1950)
  …neutrals unavoidably impose. The court of prize is emphatically a court of the law of nations; and it takes neither its character nor its rules from the mere municipal regulations of any country.” The Adeline (1815), 9 Cranch. 244, 13 U.S. 244, 284, 3 L.Ed. 719. . “The Judge or Judges of such Court of Admiralty, or other Person thereto authorized, shall, within five days after Request, finish the usual preparatory Examination of the Persons commonly examined in such Cases, to inquire, whether the Capture…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Deupree v. Levinson, 186 F.2d 297 (6th Cir. 1950)
  …d.), 557. “Where merits clearly appear on the record, it is the settled practice, in admiralty proceedings, not to dismiss the libel but to allow the party to assert his rights in the new allegation.” Mr. Justice Story, in The Adeline, 9 Cranch 244, 3 L.Ed. 719; Galatis v. Galatis (The Miss Nassau), 5 Cir., 55 F. 2d 571. Amendments to libels are freely permitted under Rule 23, Rules of Practice m Admiralty and Maritime Cases, 28 U.S.C.A. The S. S. Nea Hellis, 2 Cir., 116 F. 2d 803; The Beaconsfield, 158 U.…