WILLIAMS
v.
CONGER

U.S. | 1888-10-22
No. 105
131 U.S. 390 Supreme Court of the United States (1888) Caution
Also reported at: 33 L. Ed. 201 · 9 S. Ct. 793 · SCDB 1888-002 · 1888 U.S. LEXIS 2043
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Bradley

Mr. Justice Bradley delivered the opinion of the court.

Leave to file a motion for rehearing in this case is asked for on the ground of clerical error in the opinion. A motion for rehearing was made at the last term upon precisely the same brief now sought to be filed, and notwithstanding the alleged misconception in the opinion of the point made by the plaintiff in error, the court was satisfied with the conclusion it had reached, • and that no modification of the judgment was required, and no rehearing was necessary or called for. The motion was therefore denied. The persistent renewal of the application at this time, after the close of the term at which judgment was rendered, and especially upon the same reasons once overruled, is not in order, and does not recommend itself to the favorable consideration of the court.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cahill v. New York, 351 U.S. 183 (U.S. 1956)
    …nally, it was correctly raised in the first petition for rehearing and that should end the matter if this Court’s Rule 58 (4) is to be followed. Mr. Justice Bradley dealt with the problem of successive petitions for rehearing in Williams v. Conger, 131 U. S. 390. There the litigant claimed that a clerical error had been made in an opinion. A rehearing was asked on that ground but was denied. The Court concluded that “no modification of the judgment was required, and no rehearing was necessary or called for.…
  • Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting Co., 150 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1893)
    …presented after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was- rendered. Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch, 1; Browder v. M'Arthur, 7 Wheat. 58; Sibbald v. United States, 12 Pet. 488 ; Brooks v. Railroad Company, 102 U. S.107 ; Williams v. Conger, 131 U. S. 390. Application denied.…
  • SUN OIL Co. v. Burford, 130 F.2d 10 (5th Cir. 1942)
    …it; Thomsen v. Cayser, 243 U.S. 66, 37 S.Ct. 353, 61 L.Ed. 597, Ann.Cas. 1917D, 322. Browder v. McArthur, 7 Wheat. 58, 5 L.Ed; 397 Sibbald v. United States, 12 Pet. 488, 9 L.Ed. 1167; Peck v. Sanderson, 18 How. 42, 15 L.Ed. 262; Williams v. Conger, 131 U.S. 390, 9 S.Ct. 793, 33 L.Ed. 201. gee dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Roberts, concurred in by Chief Justice Hughes and Mr. Justice McReynolds, citing Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp., 300 U.S. 55, 57 S.Ct. 364, 81 L.Ed. 510. Railroad Comm…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw