RADFORD
v.
FOLSOM

U.S. | 1888-11-26
No. 1014
131 U.S. 392 Supreme Court of the United States (1888) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per curiam

Per curiam

: This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • The Wash., 16 F.2d 206 (2d Cir. 1926)
    …for appeal would begin to run despite the blank. Prescott, etc., Co. v. Atchison, etc., Co., 84 F. 213, 28 C. C. A. 481. [7] Even if the deeree had directed some things to be done in future, it would have been final nevertheless. Radford v. Folsom, 131 U. S. 392, 9 S. Ct. 792, 33 L. Ed. 203. Furthermore the language of the deeree as signed on September 18, 1924, never changed, there was no amendment or addition, and the situation shown in Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 6 Wall. 153, 18 L. Ed. 762, did not and does…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw