LEROY BARBER, PETITIONER,

v.

FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, CLARK & CLARK AND THE FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• The City OF Miami v. Zorovich, 195 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
  …reexamining the entire area and reclassifying the property within this use district in the best interests of public health, safety, morals and welfare of the community. . See and compare: McNayr v. State ex rel. Dupont Plaza Center, Inc., Fla.1964, 166 So. 2d 142, at page 145.…
• The City OF Naples v. Conboy, 182 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1965)
  …ing his decision the chancellor, in his decree, construed Sections 1 and S of Article IX of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A., and the appellate jurisdiction is therefore vested in this court. See McNayr v. State ex rel. Dupont Plaza Center, Inc., 166 So. 2d 142 (Fla.1964); Green v. Walter, 161 So. 2d 830 (Fla.1964); State ex rel. Glynn v. McNayr, 133 So. 2d 312 (Fla.1961). Among other things, the chancellor found (1) ordinances 400 and 615 of the City of Naples to he invalid; (2) the contracts between the…
• Marx v. Hoke Welch, 178 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
  …certain equitable relief sought by the appellants as plaintiffs relative to the 1964 Dade County tax roll. This is the same roll which was before the Supreme Court of Florida in the case of McNayr v. State ex rel. Dupont Plaza Center Inc., Fla.1964, 166 So. 2d 142. We find no error in the chancellor’s ruling in limiting the plaintiffs’ cause of action to review of the assessment [*738] ón parcels. tHey ownéd; which parcels had been reviewed by the Board of Equalization: of the County. They had -no- right of…