CHESTER CITY
v.
PENNSYLVANIA

U.S. | 1890-03-10
No. 1498
134 U.S. 240 Supreme Court of the United States (1890) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 33 L. Ed. 896 · 10 S. Ct. 536 · 1890 U.S. LEXIS 1964 · SCDB 1889-166
Cited by 33 cases

Opinion of the Court

Motions were made in this case similar to those made in Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania. Mr. Justice Bradley delivered the opinion of the court. This case, so far as any federal 'question is concerned, is similar, in all substantial respects; to that of Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, just decided, and' must be governed by the decision in that case.

The motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied, and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (12 total)

  • Smith v. Smith, 144 Fla. 500 (Fla. 1940)
    …er; that while the incompleteness of the evidence of damage might lessen the sum which the jury could find in the defendant’s favor, it did not justify the court in withdrawing the defendants’ claim from the jury. See DeWitt v. Berry, 134 U. S. 306, 33 L. Ed. 896, 10 Sup. Ct. 536; George v. Crowder, 287 Fed. 53; The St. S. Angelo Toso, 271 Fed. 245; The St. S. Angelo Toso, 265 Fed. 783; Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co. v. Rodd, 220 Fed. 750. The existence or non-existence of an implied warranty of fitness for a p…
  • Hercules Powder Co. v. Rich, 3 F.2d 12 (8th Cir. 1924)
    …s & Scott Co., 90 Wis. 590, 63 N. W. 1013; Reeves v. Byers, 155 Ind. 535, 58 N. E. 713; Alpha Checkrower Co. v. Bradley, 105 Iowa, 537, 75 N. W. 369; Junkin v. Hargrove & Arnold et al., 196 Iowa, 1387, 195 N. W. 217; De Witt v. Berry, 134 U. S. 306, 10 S. Ct. 536, 33 L. Ed. 896. An extended col [*19] lection of eases on this subject will be found in note to Loxterkamp v. Lininger Implement Co. (Iowa) 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 501. Many courts of ability and learning have held that an implied warranty may be ava…
  • Harding v. Taubel, 1 F.2d 614 (3d Cir. 1924)
    …de before or at the time of the execution of the written contracts are regarded by the law to be merged in the writing.” Rash v. Shower Bros. (C. C. A.) 288 Fed. 819; 1 Greenleaf on Evidence (16th Edition) § 275; Dewitt v. Berry, 134 U. S. 306, 315, 10 Sup. Ct. 536, 33 L. Ed. 896; Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Association, 183 U. S. 308, 318, 22 Sup. Ct. 133, 46 L. Ed. 213; Etna Forge & Bolt Co., etc., v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co., etc. (C. C. A.) 282 Fed. 786. Therefore, in the absence of fr…

Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw