INLAND AND SEABOARD COASTING COMPANY
v.
TOLSON
INLAND AND SEABOARD COASTING COMPANY
TOLSON
136 U.S. 572
Supreme Court of the United States (1890)
Caution
Also reported at: 34 L. Ed. 539 · 10 S. Ct. 1063 · 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2229 · SCDB 1889-288
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
(January 6, 1890): The motion to rescind the judgment of dismissal, entered November 4, 1889; to restore the cause to the docket; and to amend the writ of error herein by inserting therein, as plaintiffs in error, the names of Henry A. Willard, John W. Thompson, Samuel Norment and J. H. Baxter is
Grcmted and case returned to the docket.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. Barnett, 26 F.2d 350 (2d Cir. 1928)…rant him an appeal after the statute has forbidden it. See 2 Buling Case Law, 66, § 48, and cases cited above in this paragraph. It is urged that appellant’s motion to amend may be granted on the authority of [*353] Inland & Coasting Co. v. Tolson, 136 U. S. 572, 10 S. Ct. 1063, 34 L. Ed. 539; The Mary B. Curtis, 250 F. 9 (C. C. A. 9); The Seguranca, 250 F. 19 (C. C. A. 5). In the Tolson Case the missing parties, who were allowed to join as appellants, were sureties to an undertaking on appeal. They were no…1 / 2
Authorities Cited (20 total)
- Hilton v. Dickinson, 108 U.S. 165 (U.S. 1883)
- Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416 (U.S. 1870)
- The Bank of Columbia v. Okely, 4 Wheat. 235 (U.S. 1819)
- Estis v. Trabue, 128 U.S. 225 (U.S. 1888)
- Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co. v. Pendleton & Others, 115 U.S. 339 (U.S. 1885)
- Owings v. Kincannon, 7 Pet. 399 (U.S. 1833)
- Pearson v. Yewdall, 95 U.S. 294 (U.S. 1877)
- Amis v. Smith, 16 Pet. 303 (U.S. 1842)
- Beall v. New Mexico, 16 Wall. 535 (U.S. 1872)
- Feibelman v. Packard and Others, 108 U.S. 14 (U.S. 1882)