DAVENPORT
v.
PARIS

U.S. | 1890-04-14
No. 268
136 U.S. 580 Supreme Court of the United States (1890) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 34 L. Ed. 548 · 10 S. Ct. 1064 · 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2231 · SCDB 1889-290
Cited by 8 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of Glenn v. Fant, 134 U. S. 398 ; Raimond v. Terrebonne Parish, 132 U. S. 192; Andes v. Slauson, 130 U. S. 435; and Bond v. Dustin, 112 U. S. 604, and cases cited.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Irvin v. Buick Motor Co., 88 F.2d 947 (8th Cir. 1937)
    …rn Pocahontas Corp. [C.C.A.] 174 F. 1019); and rarely (c) for fraud in procuring the decree including fraudulently procured evidence and perjury, which were controlling in procuring the decree sought to be set aside (Armes v. Kimberly, 136 U.S. 629, 10 S.Ct. 1064, 34 L.Ed. 557). And in the latter situation it has been said that a bill in the nature of a bill of review must be resorted to. Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. McSherry Mfg. Co. (C.C.A.) 155 F. 524. It is not all apparent errors which may be the subject-mat…
  • Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United States, 107 F.2d 402 (9th Cir. 1939)
    …ransfer is a fact which may be established in an action at law as well as in a suit in equity.” 121 U.S. 519, 7 S.Ct. 999, 30 L.Ed. 1039. Wright v. Roseberry, supra, was followed and reaffirmed in Irwin v. San Francisco Savings Union, 136 U.S. 578, 10 S.Ct. 1064, 34 L.Ed. 540, and Tubbs v. Wilhoit, 138 U.S. 134, 11 S.Ct. 279, 34 L.Ed. 887. In Burfenning v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co., 163 U.S. [*428] 321, 16 S.Ct. 1018, 41 L.Ed. 175, cited by plaintiff, the question was whether the land…
  • Work v. United States ex rel. O'Donnell, 23 F.2d 136 (D.C. Cir. 1927)
    …and all proceedings under it were held to ho so steeped in fraud as to be totally null and void. Bouldin v. Phelps (C. C.) 30 F. 547. It is also insisted that the courts in San Francisco Sav. Union v. Irwin (C. C.) 28 F. 708, affirmed 136 U. S. 578, 10 S. Ct. 1064, 34 L. Ed. 540, held that the land in question was never a part of the Castro grant and was not included in the deed to the United States. [1] The court below refused to consider these matters of defense interposed by the government, on the theory…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw