IN RE HUNTINGTON, PETITIONER
IN RE HUNTINGTON, PETITIONER
137 U.S. 63
Supreme Court of the United States (1890)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 34 L. Ed. 567 · 11 S. Ct. 4 · 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2067 · SCDB 1890-012
Cited by 15 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Petitioner alleges that he is detained by the United States marshal for the Southern District of New York, by virtue of an order purporting to be an order of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. The motion for leave to file a petition for the writ of habeas corpus is denied upon the authority of Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584, and cases cited.
Denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ex parte Hudgings, 249 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1919)…jurisdiction of this court. Ex parte [*380] Royal, 117 U. S. 254; Riggins v. United States, 199 U. S. 547; Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420, 428; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245; Jones v. Perkins, 245 U. S. 390; Re Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584; Re Huntington, 137 U. S. 63. Whether, however, definitively the case is of such exceptional character must depend upon an analysis of the merits, which we.now proceed to make upon the petition, the return, argument for the petitioner, suggestion's by the United States, a state…
-
In re Lincoln, 202 U.S. 178 (U.S. 1906)…, the ordinary procedure for the correction of errors in criminal cases is by writ of error, and that method should be pursued unless there be special circumstances calling for a departure therefrom. Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584; In re Huntington, 137 U. S. 63; In re Lancaster, 137 U. S. 393; In re Chapman, 156 U. S. 211; Riggins v. United States, 199 U. S. 547. Several of these cases, it is true, were applications for habeas corpus prior to final decisions iti the lower courts, and the refusal of the wri…
-
Riggins v. United States, 199 U.S. 547 (U.S. 1905)…s in state courts, which are not applicable [*550] to cases in the courts of the United States, nevertheless we have frequently applied the same principle to such cases. In re Chapman, 156 U. S. 211; In re Lancaster, 137 U. S. 393; In re Huntington, 137 U. S. 63; Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584. In Chapman’s case we held that it was a judicious and salutary general rule not to interfere with proceedings pending in the courts of the District of Columbia or in the Circuit Courts of the United States in advanc…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U.S. 584 (U.S. 1887)