CHENEY
v.
HUGHES

U.S. | 1891-01-12
No. 741
138 U.S. 403 Supreme Court of the United States (1891) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 34 L. Ed. 993 · 11 S. Ct. 303 · SCDB 1890-121 · 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2094
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court.

The writ of error in this case was dismissed by plaintiff in error on the 5th of January, and at the same time a motion was made on his behalf for leave to withdraw the transcript of record heretofore filed herein. The transcript has become a part of the records of this court, which we cannot permit to be mutilated or destroyed. Its contents aré accessible here, and the original record remains in the Circuit Court. If information is desired, either source may be resorted to.

The motion is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Carter v. J. C. Owens & E. Z. Jones Doing Bus. as P'rs Under the Firm Name of Owens & Jones, 58 Fla. 204 (Fla. 1909)
    …nt, or any collusion by the latter with the purchaser, will forfeit the right of the agent to compensation for his services. Young v. Hughes, 82 N. J. Eqr. 372; Henderson v. Vincent, 84 Ala., 99, 4 South. Rep. 180; Wodsworth v. Adams, 138 U. S. 380, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 303; Pratt v. Patterson’s Ex’rs, 112 Pa. St. 475, 3 Atl. Rep. 858; Mullen v. Bower, 22 Ind. App. 294, 53 N. E. Rep. 790; Soule v. Deering, 87 Me. 365, 32 Atl. Rep. 998. In the case last cited it is correctly held that where a selling broker is aware th…
  • Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
    …190 S.C. 151, 2 S.E. 2d 382; Holland v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co., 1932, 166 S.C. 454, 165 S.C. 203, 84 A.D.R. 1336; Smith v. Jordan, Tex. Civ.App.1949, 220 S.W. 2d 481; 5 Corbin, Contracts 367 (1951). . Wadsworth v. Adams, 1890, 138 U.S. 380, 11 S.Ct. 303, 34 D.Ed. 984; Evans v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., D.C.Mun.App.1956, 127 A. 2d 842; Haymes v. Rogers, 1950,. 70 Ariz. 408, 222 P. 2d 789, 17 A.L.R.2d 896; Restatement, Agency § 469.…
  • Phelan v. Middle States OIL Corp., 220 F.2d 593 (2d Cir. 1955)
    …s were received in July, 1928. . See, e. g., Crites, Tnc., v. Prudential Company, 322 U.S. 408, 418, 64 S.Ct. 1075, 88 L.Ed. 1356; Woods v. City Bank & Trust Co., 312 U.S. 262, 268, 61 S.Ct. 493, 85 L.Ed. 820; Wadsworth v. Adams, 138 U.S. 380, 388, 11 S.Ct. 303, 34 L.Ed. 884; Mechem, Agency (2d ed. 1914) Sec. 1588; Restatement of Agency, Sec. 390 and Comment c; Sec. 469 and Comment c; Warren v. Burt, 8 Cir., 58 P. 101, 103; Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Company, 223 N.Y. 294, 304, 119 N.E. 575; Everhart…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw