THE ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY

v.

WENZEL

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• I. Addison and the Tampa Mattress Factory v. Hooks, 91 Fla. 337 (Fla. 1926)
  …erson as those of another. French Republic v. Sarasota Vichy Springs Co., 191 U. S. 427, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 145; El Modello Cigar Manuf’g. Co. v. Gato, 25 Fla. 886, 7 South. Rep. 23; Lawrence Manuf’g. Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co., 138 U. S. 537, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 396; Hopkins on Trademarks, p. 83. In this case the complainant and the defendant both use in their business in Tampa the same trade name, viz-. “Tampa Mattress Factory.” It is not alleged that the complainant had established a reputation for excellenc…
• My-T Fine Corp. v. Samuels, 69 F.2d 76 (2d Cir. 1934)
  …he cause. We need not say whether that intent is always a necessary element in such causes of suit; probably it originally was in federal courts. McLean v. Fleming, 96 U. S. 245, 24 L. Ed. 828; Lawrence Mfg. Co. v. Tennessee Mfg. Co., 138 U. S. 537, 11 S. Ct. 396, 34 L. Ed. 997; Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co., 179 U. S. 665, 21 S. Ct. 270, 45 L. Ed. 365. But when it apjiears, we think that it has an imjiortant procedural result; a late comer who deliberately copies the dress of his comp…
• Queen MFG. Co. v. Isaac Ginsberg & Bros., Inc., 25 F.2d 284 (8th Cir. 1928)
  …he evidence.” [8, 9] Fraudulent intent is a necessary ingredient of unfair competition. Elgin Nat. Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co., 179 U. S. 665, 674, 21 S. Ct. 270, 45 L. Ed. 365; Lawrence Mfg. Co. v.. Tennessee Mfg. Co., 138 U. S. 537, 549, 11 S. Ct. 396, 34 L. Ed. 997; National Picture Theatres, Inc., v. Foundation Film Corp. (C. C. A. 2) 266 F. 208, 211. In Thum Co. v. Dickinson, supra, the court said: “The essence of unfair competition consists in palming off, either directly or indirectly, one p…