EUGENE HANEY, A MINOR, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND AND LEGAL GUARDIAN, LAVELLA EDWARDS, AND LAVELLA EDWARDS, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
ADRIAN S. NEUMAN, APPELLEE
EUGENE HANEY, A MINOR, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND AND LEGAL GUARDIAN, LAVELLA EDWARDS, AND LAVELLA EDWARDS, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
ADRIAN S. NEUMAN, APPELLEE
166 So. 2d 162
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1964)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. On the question of inadequate damages, as claimed by appellant, see City of Miami, Florida et al v. Smith, 165 So.2d 748, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on June 24, 1964: also, Freeman v. Bandlow, Fla.App.1962 (2d District), 143 So.2d 547.
SHANNON, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and ELMORE, FRANK H., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Agrico Chem. Co. & Crawford Risk Mgmt. Servs. v. Tucker, 511 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…o support a modification on the ground of a mistaken determination of fact in the initial proceeding, a claimant must demonstrate an erroneous factual finding or conclusion drawn by the deputy from the evidence. Sauder v. Coast Cities Coaches, Inc., 166 So. 2d 162 (Fla.1963). The mistake must be a factual error on the part of the deputy commissioner, rather than some error or omission that occurred during the original proceedings. Hohenstein v. Jim Wilson Construction Co., 451 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).…
Authorities Cited
- City OF Miami v. Smith, 165 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1964)
- Freeman v. Bandlow, 143 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)