IN RE INGALLS, PETITIONER

U.S. | 1891-03-23
139 U.S. 548 Supreme Court of the United States (1891) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 35 L. Ed. 266 · 11 S. Ct. 652 · 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2406 · SCDB 1890-197
Cited by 24 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curíam.

Per Curíam.

This is an application for a writ of error made to the court in session, under the apprehension on the part of counsel that it was directed to be so presented. We have, therefore, considered it, with the result that the writ must be denied. Dale Tile Mfg. Co. v. Hyatt, 125 U. S. 46; Walter A. Wood Co. v. Skinner, ante, 293.

We wish it to be distinctly .understood that in future no •such application will be entertained, except when a Justice of this Court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper under special circumstances to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way.

Writ refused.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (22 total)

  • …and the results, so that not having an operative note is not acceptable medical care.” B. The general rule that the burden of proof lies where the pleadings place it, see Selma, Rome & Dalton Railroad v. United States, 139 U.S. 560, 11 S.Ct. 638, 35 L.Ed. 266 (1891), works fairly so long as the party upon which the burden of proof is [*1305] placed is in a better position to adduce the required proof. Where that is not the case, and it appears that facts essential to the matter lie “peculiarly within the…
    1 / 2
  • State v. Couch, 117 Fla. 609 (Fla. 1934)
    …t the burden of proof rests on the person who wishes to support his case or defense by a particular fact lying more peculiarly within his knowledge or of which he is supposed to be cognizant. See Selma R. & D. R. Co. v. United States, 139 U. S. 560, 35 L. Ed. 266, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 638. The respondent could not cast the burden upon the relator by averring that the relator did hot ask in good faith for the privilege of examining the books but that he sought merely to harrass and annoy the respondent and inter…
  • Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, 198 U.S. 118 (U.S. 1905)

Previewing 3 of 22 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw