BORAH
v.
WILSON

U.S. | 1891-04-20
No. 309
140 U.S. 47 Supreme Court of the United States (1891) Caution
Also reported at: 35 L. Ed. 338 · 11 S. Ct. 690 · SCDB 1890-219 · 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2428
Cited by 19 cases
Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.

Pee Curiam.

The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed upon the authority of Leach v. The People, 122 Illinois, 420; Harter v. Kernochan, 103 U. S. 562; Bonham v. Needles, 103 U. S. 648.

Affirmed,.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 106 F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1939)
    …mprov. Fund v. Greenough, 105 U.S. 527, 26 L.Ed. 1157; Williams v. Morgan, 111 U.S. 684, 4 S.Ct. 638, 28 L.Ed. 559; Central Trust Co. v. Grant Locomotive Works, 135 U.S. 207, 10 S.Ct. 736, 34 L.Ed. 97; Hill v. Chicago & Evanston R. Co., 140 U.S. 52, 11 S.Ct. 690, 35 L.Ed. 331; United States v. River Rouge Imp. Co., 269 U.S. 411, 46 S.Ct. 144, 70 L.Ed. 339. We are not unmindful of the holding in Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U.S. 238, 53 S.Ct. 586, 77 L.Ed. 1148, that claims for copyright infringement and for unfair…
  • Republic OF China v. Am. Express Co., Inc., 190 F.2d 334 (2d Cir. 1951)
    …. 2d 377, 379; Withenbury v. U. S., 5 Wall. 819, 18 L.Ed. 613; Savannah v. Jesup, 106 U.S. 563, 565, 1 S.Ct. 512, 27 L.Ed. 276; Williams v. Morgan, 111 U.S. 684, 689, 4 S.Ct. 638, 28 L.Ed. 559; Hill v. Chicago & E. Railroad Company, 140 U.S. 52, 54, 11 S.Ct. 690, 35 L.Ed. 331; U. S. v. River Rouge Co., 269 U.S. 411, 413-414, 46 S.Ct. 144, 70 L.Ed. 339; Clark v. Williard, 292 U.S. 112, 118, 54 S.Ct. 615, 78 L.Ed. 1160; Radio Station WOW v. Johnson, 326 U.S. 120, 126, 65 S.Ct. 1475, 89 L.Ed. 2092; Standley v.…
  • Bendix Aviation Corp. v. Glass, 195 F.2d 267 (3d Cir. 1952)

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw