BIRDSEYE

v.

SCHAEFFER

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 169 U.S. 92 (U.S. 1898)
  …ontroversy between the plaintiff and the railway company, a citizen of a different State from himself. That order is not reviewable by this court. Gurnee v. Patrick County, 137 U. S. 141; In re Pennsylvania Co., 137 U. S. 451; Birdseye v. Schaeffer, 140 U. S. 117; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Fitzgerald, 160 U. S. 556. After the case had been so remanded, and when it was called for trial in the state court, the plaintiff discontinued his action against all the individual defendants, leaving it an action bet…
• Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. Hull, 114 F.2d 464 (D.C. Cir. 1940)
  …‡ ft 175 U.S. 423, 458, 20 S.Ct. 168, 44 L.Ed. 223. La Abra Silver Mining Co. v. United States, 175 U.S. 423, 458, 20 S.Ct. 168, 44 L.Ed. 223. Frelinghuysen v. Key, 110 U.S. 63, 72, 3 S.Ct. 462, 28 L.Ed. 71. Williams v. Heard, 140 U.S. 529, 537, 11 S.Ct. 885, 35 L.Ed. 550; United States ex rel. Boynton v. Blaine, 139 U.S. 306, [*473] 323, 11 S.Ct. 607, 35 L.Ed. 183. See United States v. Weld, 127 U.S. 51, 55-57, 8 S.Ct. 1000, 32 L.Ed. 62. Cf. Comegys v. Vasse, 1 Pet. 193, 212, 7 L.Ed. 108; Judson v. Co…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• In re Bracewell v. Kelley, 454 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2006)
  …colleague argues that decisions of the Supreme Court and this Court establish that a crop loss automatically creates property rights. The Supreme Court cases that the dissent relies on are two cases from the 1800’s, Williams v. Heard, 140 U.S. 529, 11 S.Ct. 885, 35 L.Ed. 550 (1891), and Milnor v. Metz, 41 U.S. (16 Pet.) 221, 10 L.Ed. 943 (1842). Of course, both of those decisions pre-date the adoption of the Bankruptcy Code, and the critical language we are interpreting, by a century or so. Not only that…

  ← 1 / 3 →

Authorities Cited

• Gurnee v. Patrick Cnty., 137 U.S. 141 (U.S. 1890)