JOSEPH MANNING ARMBRUSTER, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
DOROTHY H. ARMBRUSTER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1964-07-14
No. 63-816
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and PIENDRY, JJ.
166 So. 2d 230 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1964) Negative Treatment
Cited by 14 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-husband appeals from that portion of a divorce decree which dealt with the amount of alimony and child support awarded to appellee-wife.

Appellant contends that the chancellor awarded the wife too much, in that, there is not enough money left for appellant to support himself.

The briefs have raised only issues of fact which were decided by the chancellor on conflicting testimony. Our study of the record reveals that there was ample competent evidence to support his award. Appellant has not shown that the chancellor abused his discretion in making the award. Bailey v. Bailey, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 165.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Griffith v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 485 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1986)
    …fting jurisdiction over actions for possession of real property from circuit to county courts, enacted subsequent to filing action in circuit court, deprived circuit court of jurisdiction over pending case); Gewant v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 166 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964) (statute deprived Real Estate Commission of jurisdiction to discipline broker for acts committed prior to repeal of jurisdiction). “Without jurisdiction, the court cannot proceed at all in any cause. Jurisdiction is power to decl…
  • Navarro v. Barnett Bank OF W. Fla., 543 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …clause. See Pensacola A.R. Co. v. State, 45 Fla. 86, 33 So. 985 (1903); Fogg v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 473 So. 2d 1352 (4th DCA 1985); Bureau of Crimes Compensation v. Williams, 405 So. 2d 747 (2d DCA 1981); Gewant v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 166 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). Our holding does not unconstitutionally deprive appellee of a vested right created by section 30.19. This statute merely embodied the common law method of punishing a sheriff or deputy for his or her failure to execute a writ or…
  • …y in force. Goldenberg v. Dome Condominium Association, Inc., 376 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); 1A SUTHERLAND § 23.13 (rev. 3d ed. 1972). Only provisions omitted from the reenactment are considered repealed. Gewant v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 166 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). The applicable provisions in both enactments of Chapter 458 are similar, and both proscribe the conduct that is the subject matter of this appeal. The legislature merely explicitly condemned conduct which had previously been impl…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw