TUSKALOOSA NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
GUDE
TUSKALOOSA NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
GUDE
141 U.S. 244
Supreme Court of the United States (1891)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 35 L. Ed. 742 · 11 S. Ct. 1004 · SCDB 1890-307 · 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2517
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Weinstein v. Black Diamond S. S. Corp., 31 F.2d 519 (2d Cir. 1929)…this statute, it may be conceded that the motion would have to be granted. The mere approval of a bond by the judge of the trial court could not operate as a writ of error. Loveless v. Ransom, 109 F. 391 (C. C. A. 7); Tuskaloosa N. Ry. Co. v. Gude, 141 U. S. 244, 11 S. Ct. 1004, 35 L. Ed. 742. But the statute must have done more than merely change the title of the suitor in the appellate court from plaintiff in error to appellant. Informalities which were not fatal in appeals from decrees in equity or admi…1 / 2