HALEY
v.
BREEZE

U.S. | 1892-03-21
No. 211
144 U.S. 130 Supreme Court of the United States (1892) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 36 L. Ed. 373 · 12 S. Ct. 836 · SCDB 1891-155 · 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2062
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice:

The Chief Justice:

The writ of error is dismissed because the record presents no Federal question properly raised, and , the. judgment of-the Supreme Court of the State proceeded upon an independent gtound not.involving a Federal question and broad enough to maintain the judgment.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Wilson v. Haley Live Stock Co., 153 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1894)
  • Lenworth Bailey v. Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC, 889 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2018)
    …received, $10,593.14. Bailey confesses that AMC has a contract right to the reasonable fee and pleads an avoidance defense that purportedly avoids that confession: the balance billing provision limits the amount of the fee. Cf. Haley v. Breeze , 144 U.S. 130, 131, 12 S.Ct. 836, 837, 36 L.Ed. 373 (1892) (describing a confession and avoidance defense). This is the case, Bailey argues, even though AMC did not have notice of the terms of his automobile insurance agreement-specifically the second method of…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw