RICE
v.
SANGER

U.S. | 1892-03-28
No. 1400
144 U.S. 197 Supreme Court of the United States (1892) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 36 L. Ed. 403 · 12 S. Ct. 664 · 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2068 · SCDB 1891-161
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice :

The Chief Justice :

This was an action commenced by one Rice against Sanger et al. in the District Court of Bourbon County, Kansas, wherein judgment was rendered February 27, 1888, in favor of plaintiff. The cause was thereupon taken by the defendants to the Supreme Court of that State, the judgment reversed, and the cause remandad for further proceedings in accordance with the views of the court as expressed in its written opinion. To review this judgment, a writ of error from this court was allowed, but after that, the case went back to the state district court in accordance with the-mandate of the Supreme Court, and was subsequently tried therein.

The judgment attempted to be brought here was not a final judgment, and the writ of error is Dismissed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hume v. Bowie, 148 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1893)
    …the opinion of the court: This case comes before us on a motion to dismiss the writ of error for want of jurisdiction, upon the ground that the judgment brought here by the writ is not a final judgment. Baker v. White, 92 U. S. 176; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197: Brown v. Baxter, 146 U. S. 619. The question involved is one of power, for if the court had power to make the order, when it was made, then it was .not a final judgment, as it merely vacated the former judgment for the purpose of a new trial upon t…
  • Great W. Tel. Co. v. Burnham, 162 U.S. 339 (U.S. 1896)
    …the Supreme Court, and for that reason is not the final judgment of the highest court in the State in which a decision in the suit could be had. Rev. Stat. § 709. The writ is dismissed.” See also Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197; Rutland Railroad v. Central Vermont Railroad, 159 U. S. 630, 638; Sanford Co., petitioner, 160 U. S. 247. In the case at bar, it was argued in support of the jurisdiction of this court that, if an appeal had been taken from the final judgment of t…
  • Beasley v. Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co., 191 U.S. 492 (U.S. 1903)

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw