JOY

v.

ADELBERT COLLEGE

Citator

Cited By

• Wabash R.R. Co. v. Adelbert Coll. of the W. Reserve Univ., 208 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1908)
  …r were parties'to the-proceedings in the Circuit Courts of-the.Uni-, ted States, and an attempt to remove this case from the'Ohio courts to'the Circuit Court of the United States, resisted by the defendants in error, failed. Joy v. Adelbert-College, 146 U. S. 355. It appears -from this statement that the, railroad property affected, by this controversy was in the actual possession, through receivers, of Circuit Courts of the United States from date of the appointment of receivers, May 27, .1884, to the date…
• Bender v. Pa. Co., 148 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1893)
  …to remand the case1 to the State Court. Such an order is not a'final judgment'on the merits, and the writ of error must be dismissed. ' McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Chicago, St. Paul &c. Railway v. Roberts, 141 U. S. 690; Joy v. Adelbert College, 146 U. S. 355.…
• United States v. Songer, 842 F.2d 240 (10th Cir. 1988)
  …vernment’s view, current practice under the rule is logically untenable. The government argues that since the Constitution allows trial in absentia, by [*242] implication sentencing in absentia is equally permissible. Citing Lewis v. United States, 146 U.S. 355, 13 S.Ct. 186, 36 L.Ed. 1003 (1892), the government points out that while the right to confront one’s accusers is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, the Supreme Court has held that a defendant may waive that due process guarantee…

Authorities Cited

• McLISH v. Roff, 141 U.S. 661 (U.S. 1891)
• Gurnee v. Patrick Cnty., 137 U.S. 141 (U.S. 1890)
• Chicago v. Roberts, 141 U.S. 690 (U.S. 1891)
• Richmond & Danville R.R. Co. v. Thouron, 134 U.S. 45 (U.S. 1890)