IN RE HAWKINS, PETITIONER
IN RE HAWKINS, PETITIONER
147 U.S. 486
Supreme Court of the United States (1893)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 37 L. Ed. 251 · 13 S. Ct. 512 · 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2176 · SCDB 1892-094
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice :
This is an application on behalf of John P. Hawkins for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and to the judges thereof, commanding them to receive and duly consider certain depositions or further proofs taken by petitioner on appeal in an action pending in that court wherein he is tíie libellant and appellee. • The depositions in question were suppressed-by the court on motion and for reasons given.
We cannot by mandamus review the judicial action thus had in the exercise of legitimate jurisdiction. In re Morrison, petitioner, ante, 14; Ex parte Morgan, 114 U. S. 174; Ex parte Burtis, 103 U. S. 238; Ex parte Schwab, 98 U. S. 240.
Leave to file the petition is
Denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Constr. Co. v. Jacksonville, 148 U.S. 372 (U.S. 1893)…f Appeals or to the Circuit Court. The decisions of this, court upon applications for writs of mandamus since the act of 1891 affirm the principles established in the earlier decisions, before cited. In re Morrison, 147 U. S. 14, 26 ; In re Hawkins, 147 U. S. 486; In re Haberman Manuf. Co., 147 U. S. 525; Virginia v. Paul, ante, 107, 124. In the first case, therefore, the writs 'of mandamus, as well as the writ of certiorari, must be denied. The second case' is governed by the same considerations as the fi…
-
In re the Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 304 U.S. 486 (U.S. 1938)…or even abuse of discretion. Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 287 U. S. 178, 203-204. Ex parte Whitney, 13 Pet. 404, 408. Ex parte Taylor, 14 How. 3, 13. Ex parte Railway Co., 101 U. S. 711, 720. In re Hawkins, Petitioner, 147 U. S. 486, 490. In re Atlantic City Railroad, 164 U. S. 633, 635. In re James Pollitz, 206 U. S. 323, 331. Cf. Ex parte Simons, 247 U. S. 231, 240. [*498] Stripped of unnecessary details and language, the circumstances under which the lower court made the cha…
-
In re Parsons, 150 U.S. 150 (U.S. 1893)…an we, through the instrumentality of that writ, review its judicial action had in the exercise of legitimate jurisdiction. Ex parte Flippin, 94 U. S., 348; Ex parte Burtis, 103 U. S. 238; In re Morrison, 147 U. S. 14, 26; In re Hawkins, Petitioner, 147 U. S. 486, 490; American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa &c. Railway Co., 148 U. S. 372, 379, 386; In re Humes, Petitioner, 149 U. S. 192. These settled principles control the applications before us, and it follows that they must be Denied…
Authorities Cited
- Irvine v. The Hesper, 122 U.S. 256 (U.S. 1887)
- Ex parte Morgan & Another, 114 U.S. 174 (U.S. 1885)
- The Lucille, 19 Wall. 73 (U.S. 1873)
- Ex parte Schwab, 98 U.S. 240 (U.S. 1878)
- Ex parte Burtis, 103 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1880)