IN RE SCHNEIDER, PETITIONER
IN RE SCHNEIDER, PETITIONER
13 S. Ct. 572
Supreme Court of the United States (1893)
Caution
Also reported at: 148 U.S. 157 · 148 U.S. 162 · 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2217 · 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2218 · 37 L. Ed. 404 · 37 L. Ed. 406 · SCDB 1892-135 · SCDB 1892-258
Cited by 26 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice :
The application for a writ of error or appeal is denied upon the authority of Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82; In re Heath, Petitioner, 144 U. S. 92; Cross, Petitioner, 146 U. S. 271; Cross v. United States, 145 U. S. 571. See also Railroad Co. v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398; Dennison v. Alexander, 103 U. S. 522; United States ex rel. Trask v. Wanamaker, 147 U. S. 149.
Writ denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Patton v. United States, 281 U.S. 276 (U.S. 1930)…d was (p. 97): “Does the ground of this application go to the jurisdiction or authority of the Supreme Court of the District, or rather is it not an allegation of mere error? If the latter, it cannot be reviewed in this proceeding. In re Schneider, 148 U. S. 162, and cases cited.” After reviewing authorities, it was held that the Supreme Court of the District had jurisdiction to determine the validity of the act which authorized the waiver, and that its action could not be reviewed on habeas corpus. In the…
-
Harlan v. McGourin, 218 U.S. 442 (U.S. 1910)…the jurisdiction under that writ is confined to an examination of the record, with a view to determining whether the person restrained of his liberty is detained without authority of law. Gonzales v. Cunningham, 164 U. S. 612, 621; In re Schneider, 148 U. S. 162; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 136; Hoy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U. S. 542, 548; In re Wilson, Petitioner, 140 U. S. 575, 582. But it is contended that two recent cases in this court are authority for the proposition that in a collateral attack by a h…
-
Dorsey v. Gill, 148 F.2d 857 (D.C. Cir. 1945)…60; Miller v. Hiatt, 3 Cir., 141 F. 2d 690; Eury v. Huff, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 289, 146 F. 2d 17; Bozel v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 126 F. 2d 585; Friedberg v. United States, 5 Cir., 69 F. 2d 170; United States v. Davis, 18 App.D.C. 280, 283; In re Schneider, 148 U.S. 162, 13 S.Ct. 572, 37 L.Ed. 406; See Holtzoff Collateral Review of Convictions in Federal Courts, 25 B.U.L.Rev. 26, 40. Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 276, 63 S.Ct. 236, 87 L.Ed. 268, 143 A.L.R. 435; Walker v. Chitty, 9 Cir., 112…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hans Nielsen, 131 U.S. 176 (U.S. 1889)
- Chew Heong v. United States, 112 U.S. 536 (U.S. 1884)
- R.R. Co. v. Grant, 98 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1878)
- In re Heath, 144 U.S. 92 (U.S. 1892)
- Cross v. Burke, 146 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1892)
- United States ex rel. Trask v. Wanamaker, 147 U.S. 149 (U.S. 1893)
- Cross v. United States, 145 U.S. 571 (U.S. 1892)
- In re Cross, 146 U.S. 271 (U.S. 1892)
- Dennison v. Alexander, 103 U.S. 522 (U.S. 1880)