UNITED STATES
v.
DUMAS
UNITED STATES
DUMAS
149 U.S. 287
Supreme Court of the United States (1893)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 37 L. Ed. 737 · 13 S. Ct. 874 · 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2300 · SCDB 1892-217
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Jackson : This case, in all essential respects, is similar to that of United States v. Dumas, No. 230, just decided, the only difference being that this suit is based upon a bond for a different period, and against a different set of sureties, but it involves the same questions and on the same state of facts as presented in the former ease. For the reasons given in the opinion in the former ease the judgment below in this case is Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sontag Chain Stores Co., Ltd. v. Nat'l Nut Co. of Cal., 310 U.S. 281 (U.S. 1940)…S. 373; Ives v. Sargent, (1887) 119 U. S. 652; Parker & Whipple Co. v. Yale Clock Co., (1887) 123 U. S. 87; Electric Gas Co. v. Boston Electric Co., (1891) 139 U. S. 481; Topliff v. Topliff, (1892) 145 U. S. 156; Leggett v. Standard Oil Co., (1893) 149 U. S. 287; Dunham v. Dennison Manufacturing Co., (1894) 154 U. S. 103; Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Baldwin, (1917) 245 U. S. 198; Keller v. Adams-Campbell Co., (1924) 264 U. S. 314, and cases there cited; Altoona Theatres v. Tri-Ergon Corp., (1935) 294 U. S. 4…
-
Powell v. Zuckert, 366 F.2d 634 (D.C. Cir. 1966)…tely explained delay in filing a lawsuit in Grasse v. Snyder, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 352, 192 F. 2d 35 (1951), was aggravated by a prior two-year delay by plaintiff in appealing his discharge to the Civil Service Commission. . Leggett v. Standard Oil Co., 149 U.S. 287, 294, 13 S.Ct. 902, 37 L.Ed. 737 (1893) (14-15 years); Washington v. Opie, 145 U.S. 214, 12 S.Ct. 822, 36 L.Ed. 680 (1892) (15 years); Gillons v. Shell Co. of Calif., 9 Cir., 86 F. 2d 600 (1936), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 689, 58 S.Ct. 9, 82 L.Ed. 532…1 / 2
-
Gillons v. Shell Co. of Cal., 86 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1936)…e former patent owners, Judge Crow and Joseph B. Shannon, a state senator of Missouri, lacked the funds necessary to bring suit. Second, by the weight of authority, poverty is no excuse for delay in filing suit. In Leggett v. Standard Oil Company, 149 U.S. 287, 294, 13 S.Ct. 902, 905, 37 L.Ed. 737, the court said: “No sufficient reason is given for this delay in suing. It is sought to be excused on the ground of the plaintiff’s poverty during this per riod; but in the case of Hayward v. National Bank, 96…1 / 4
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence