MORSE

v.

ANDERSON

Citator

Cited By

• Colvin v. Jacksonville, 158 U.S. 456 (U.S. 1895)
  …51, 652, 693, 697; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; and in view of the general rule as to the inability of the court to deal with matters of this sort after the expiration-of the term; Hickman v. City of Fort Scott, 141 U. S. 415; Morse v. Anderson, 150 U. S. 156 But we assume, though it is somewhat obscure, that the term was still open when this certificate was signed. The certificate is as follows: . . “This cause came on to be heard upon a motion for an injunction as prayed for in the bill of complaint…
• Jennings v. Philadelphia, 218 U.S. 255 (U.S. 1910)
  …ter a writ of error has been entered in this court, all authority of the court below to allow a bill of exceptions then first presented, or to alter or amend a bill of exceptions already allowed and filed, is at an end.” See also Morse v. Anderson, 150 U. S. 156; Muller v. Ehlers, 91 U. S. 249; Merchants’ Insurance Co. v. Buckner, C. C. A., 6th Cir., 98 Fed. Rep. 222. But it is urged that if the appellee consented that an order might be entered nunc pro tunc, permitting. the' filing and allowance of a bill…
• In re Bills of Exceptions, 37 F.2d 849 (6th Cir. 1930)
  …at purpose where necessary to make the full time allowed (which would seem to be inconsistent with Jennings v. Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co., 218 U. S. at page 256, 31 S. Ct. 1, 54 L. Ed. 1031). In Morse v. Anderson, 150 U. S. 156, 158, 14 S. Ct. 43, 37 L. Ed. 1037, there had been several extensions, each within the life of the proceeding, but the final one had expired. The validity of the earlier extensions was not considered. In Ward v. Cochran, 150 U. S. 597, 602, 14 S. Ct. 230, 37 L. Ed. 1195, the term had…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Mich. Ins. Bank v. Eldred, 143 U.S. 293 (U.S. 1892)
• Hume v. Bowie, 148 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1893)
• Müller v. Ehlers, 91 U.S. 249 (U.S. 1875)
• Glaspell v. N. Pac. R.R. Co., 144 U.S. 211 (U.S. 1892)