TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY
v.
GRIFFIN; TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY V. OVERHEISER

U.S. | 1894-01-01
Nos. 136 and 137
151 U.S. 105 Supreme Court of the United States (1894) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 38 L. Ed. 90 · 14 S. Ct. 257 · SCDB 1893-085 · 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2035
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:

These eases are reported in 76 Texas, 437, 441, and involve here the same questions as those in the case above decided.

The judgments are, severally, Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Director General of Railroads v. Fanny Into, 83 Fla. 377 (Fla. 1922)
    …use that is binding on the parties. See Bucki v. Cone, 25 Fla. 1, 6 South. Rep. 160; Curtis v. Howard, 33 Fla. 251, 14 South. Rep. 812; St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Mc [*380] Bride, 141 U. S. 127, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 982; Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Griffin, 151 U. S. 105, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 259; United States v. Hvoslef, 237 U. S. 1, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 459; 27 R. C. L. 783, 801; State ex rel. Stephens v. District Court, 43 Mont. 571, 118 Pac. Rep. 268, Ann. Cas. 1912C 343; 22 Ency. Pl. & Pr. 815; Little v. Chicago, St.…
  • Interior Constr. & Improvement Co. v. Gibney, 160 U.S. 217 (U.S. 1895)
    …mer, 8 Wheat. 699; Toland v. Sprague, 12 Pet. 300, 330; Ex parte Schollenberger, 96 U. S. 369, 378; St. Louis & Sam Francisco Railway v. McBride, 141 U. S. 127; Southern Pacific Co. v. Denton, 146 U. S. 202, 206; Texas & Pacific Railway v. Saunders, 151 U. S. 105; Central Trust Co. v. McGeorge, 151 U. S. 129; Southern Express Co. v. Todd, 12 U. S. App. 351. In Smith v. Lyon, 133 U. S. 315, this court held that the provision of the act of 1888, as to the district in which a suit between citizens of different…
  • W. Loan & Sav. Co. v. Butte & Boston Consol. Mining Co., 210 U.S. 368 (U.S. 1908)
    …sbey & Mattison Company, 160 U. S. 221; Ex parte Schollenberger, 96 U. S. 369; Central Trust Company v. McGeorge, 151 U. S. 129; St. Louis &c. R. R. Co. v. McBride, 141 U. S. 127; Lowry v. Tile, 98 Fed. Rep. 817; Texas & Pacific Railway v. Saunders, 151 U. S. 105. Thereafter, before any further, steps were taken in the case, the learned judge changed his ruling on the question of jurisdiction, and filed the following brief memorandum opinion: “As neither party to this action was, at the time of the institut…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw