ROWE
v.
PHELPS

U.S. | 1894-03-05
No. 237
152 U.S. 87 Supreme Court of the United States (1894) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 38 L. Ed. 365 · 14 S. Ct. 632 · 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2096 · SCDB 1893-146
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
Me. Justice Brown,

Mr. Justice Brown,

after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no assignment of errors sent up with the record in this case, as required by Bev. Stat. § 997, and no “ specification of the errors relied upon,” as required by Bule 21 of this court. This rule requires that the specification “ shall set out separately and particularly each' error assigned and intended to be urged,” and there is no such “plain error not assigned or specified,” as calls upon the court to exercise its option to review the questions involved. It would seem that unless the statute and rule are to be entirely disregarded, this writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Holmgren v. United States, 217 U.S. 509 (U.S. 1910)
  • Birkett v. Columbia Bank, 195 U.S. 345 (U.S. 1904)
  • Brampton Woolen Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 45 F.2d 327 (1st Cir. 1930)
    …ectation of compensation, or with the general understanding among the directors themselves that they should receive compensation.” (Italics mine.) Fletcher Cyc. Corp., Vol. 4, §§ 2734, 2735; Corinne Mill, Canal & Stock Co. v. Toponce, 152 U. S. 405, 14 S. Ct. 632, 38 L. Ed. 493; Pac. Imp. Co. v. Chattanooga S. R. Co. (C. C.) 189 F. 161; Hayes v. Canada, A. & P. S. S. Co. (C. C. A.) 181 F. 289; Steam Dredge No. 1 (1). C.) 87 F. 760; Smith v. Putnam, 61 N. H. 632. Fletcher also says, Yol. 4, § 2736: “The case…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw