UNITED STATES
v.
MOWRY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The United States contracted with Mowry in 1861 to construct railroad cars for military use, and after the cars were delivered and approved, a board of commissioners investigated the contract and allowed only $58,750 of the $76,250 claimed, which Mowry accepted. The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Claims' decision awarding the remaining balance, holding that Mowry was conclusively bound by the board's findings and his acceptance of the reduced payment.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Mr. Justice Nelson delivered the opinion-of the court.
This is an appeal from the Court of Claims.
The petition of Mowry sets forth that railroad cars were needed on the Pacific Railroad, in Missouri, for the transportation of men and supplies in the military department of the West, then in command of General Fremont, and that, on the 22d September, 1861, he made a contract with Chief Quartermaster McKinstry, at the head of that department under General Fremont, to construct fifty box cars and fifty platform cars, the former for- $825 each, and the latter for $700 each. These cars were afterwards constructed, approved and taken into the service of-the government.
The payment of the price on this contract was among many others within that military district, suspended upon allegations of fraud and irregularities committed therein, and a board of commissioners-appointed to investigate them and report to the Secretary of War. The petitioner presented his claim before this board, charging the contract price, amounting to $76,250. This board, after investigation, allowed to the petitioner $58,750, and gave him a voucher for that amount, the payment of which was accepted by him from the government, as provided for by an act of Congress; The Court of Claims allowed the balance of the contract price; $17,250.
The case falls within the decision of this court just rendered in the case of The United States v. Adams, 7 Wall. 463. Under the circumstances the petitioner is concluded by the finding of the board and acceptance of payment.
The decree must be Mr. Attorney General, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Dickey and Mr. E. P. Norton for appellant.
Mr. R. M. Corwine, Mr. J. M. Carlisle and Mr. J. D. McPherson for appellee.
Reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to enter a decree dismissing the petition.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
ST. Louis v. United States, 268 U.S. 169 (U.S. 1925)…. 483; St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern R. R. Co. v. United States, 267 U. S. 346. In Cairo, Truman & Southern R. R. Co. v. United States, 267 U. S. 350, the release was under seal. United States v. Adams, 7 Wall. 463, 479; United States v. Mowry, 154 U. S. 564; United States v. Morgan, 154 U. S. 565. Baird v. United States, 96 U. S. 430; Murphy v. United States, 104 U. S. 464. Savage v. United States, 92 U. S. 382, 388. Stewart v. Barnes, 153 U. S. 456; Pacific Railroad v. United States, 158 U. S. 118.…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Adams, 7 Wall. 463 (U.S. 1868)