MACKALL
v.
RICHARDS
MACKALL
RICHARDS
154 U.S. 624
Supreme Court of the United States (1877)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 38 L. Ed. 1090 · 1877 U.S. LEXIS 1739 · SCDB 1876-248
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Waite announced the opinion of the court.
This record presents for our consideration only a question of fact, and without discussing the testimony it is sufficient to say that after a careful examination of the case we are entirely satisfied with the decree below, which is consequently affirmed. No further opinion will be delivered. Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rhoderick v. Swartzell, 65 F.2d 813 (D.C. Cir. 1933)…8 L. Ed. 271; Allen v. St. Louis Nat. Bank, 120 U. S. 20, 7 S. Ct. 460, 30 L. Ed 573—and mere suspicious circumstances will not require the decision of the lower court on the evidence to be disturbed. Case v. Marchand, 154 U. S. 642, 14 S. Ct. 1197, 38 L. Ed. 1090. We have been at pains to examine the evidence carefully, and we find nothing there to justify us in upsetting the findings of the trial court. The insurance company was applied to for a loan of above a million and a half dollars on the credit of i…
-
JOY v. Godchaux, 35 F.2d 649 (8th Cir. 1929)…s payment as upon the payment of any other debt due to the company. Sanger v. Upton, 91 U. S. 56, 23 L. Ed. 220; Webster v. Upton, Assignee, 91 U. S. 65, 23 L. Ed. 384; Camden v. Stuart, 144 U. S. 104, 12 S. Ct. 585, 36 L. Ed. 363; Herhold v. Upton, 154 U. S. 624, Appx., and 14 S. Ct. 1203, 23 L. Ed. 892. The contest is not between two parties in pari delicto. While the creditors may not be in the same category as innocent holders of notes, they occupy a status brought about by reliance upon appellee and oth…