HAYNES
v.
PICKETT

U.S. | 1877-03-13
No. 837
154 U.S. 627 Supreme Court of the United States (1877) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 23 L. Ed. 1008 · SCDB 1876-236 · 1877 U.S. LEXIS 1744
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Waite

Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the.court.

There is a Federal question in this case, but it was decided in Bay v. Norseworthy, 23 Wall. 128, and we are not inclined to hear it re-argued. The motion to dismiss is, therefore, denied, and that to affirm granted., upon the .authority of that case. Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Luminous Unit Co. v. Freeman-Sweet Co., 3 F.2d 577 (7th Cir. 1924)
    …essence, even though interlocutory in time relation. The rights of the parties are determined as of the date of such a decree, a subsequent surrender of the patent does not involve an abandonment of such rights (Mevs v. Conover, 125 U. S. 144, 145, 23 L. Ed. 1008), and the recovery on the accounting will not be based upon the surrendered patent, but upon that decree which itself is based upon a patent in full force at the date of its entry.” To determine whether there should he a reversal of the order now a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw