COWDREY
v.
VANDENBURGH
COWDREY
VANDENBURGH
154 U.S. 659
Supreme Court of the United States (1880)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1554 · SCDB 1879-250
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Field delivered the opinion of the court.
The decree in this case is affirmed for the reasons given in the above opinion (Cowdrey v. Vandenburgh, 101 U. S. 572).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Horton, 233 U.S. 492 (U.S. 1914)…er the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. There is a motion to dismiss, upon the ground that no return day is specified in the writ of error or citation. Carroll v. Dorsey (1857), 20 How. 204, 207, and Sea v. Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co. (1880), 154 U. S. 659, are relied upon. These decisions were based upon § 22 of the Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789, c. 20, 1 Stat. 73, 84, which was held to require a certain return day to be specified in the writ of error. Accordingly, General Rule [*498] 33, prom…
Authorities Cited
- Cowdrey v. Vandenburgh, 101 U.S. 572 (U.S. 1879)