UNITED STATES
v.
CANDA

U.S. | 1882-04-10
No. 257
26 L. Ed. 1069 Supreme Court of the United States (1882) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 14 S. Ct. 1211 · SCDB 1881-248 · 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1298
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Waite

Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes here on a certificate of division as to question./ arising on a motion to quash an information, and must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, on the authority of United States v. Rosenburgh, 7 Wall. 580, and United States v. Avery, 13 Wall. 251. It is consequently so ordered. Dismissed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet Corp., 24 F.2d 963 (2d Cir. 1928)
    …gues that this was a maritime tort, and that the maritime law controls, and therefore the contributory negligence was not an absolute bar to [*964] a recovery. We think the court correctly instructed the jury; under the authority of Belden v. Chase, 154 U. S. 674, 14 S. Ct. 264, 37 L. Ed. 1218, Atlee v. Packet Co., 21 Wall. 389, 22 L. Ed. 619, and Maleeny v. Standard Shipbuilding Co., 237 N. Y. 250, 142 N. E. 602. We have not overlooked the Castagna Case (C. C. A.) 280 F. 618, where, in a dictum, it was inad…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw