E. G. PASS
v.
STATE
E. G. PASS
STATE
121 Fla. 336
Florida Supreme Court (1935)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 163 So. 583
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
The indictment herein being under Section 7153 (5051), Compiled General Laws, and not Section 7557 (5414), Compiled General Laws, the evidence is of such a nature that a new trial should be granted. See Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 93 So. 176; Hollis v. State, 27 Fla. 387, 9 So. 67. See also McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117, 45 So. 843.
Reversed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Town of Boynton Beach, 129 Fla. 528 (Fla. 1937)…them we held that delay was fatal in stated periods while in others we refused to do so. Town of Ormond v. Shaw, 50 Fla. 445, 39 So. 108; State, ex rel. Davis, v. City of Stuart, 97 Fla. 69, 120 So. 335; State, ex rel. Landis, v. City of Auburndale, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 698; State, ex rel. Attorney General, v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 102 Fla. 1019, 136 So. 889; Town of Boynton v. State, ex rel. Davis, 103 Fla. 1113, 138 So. 639; State, ex rel. Davis, v. City of Clearwater, 106 Fla. 761, 139 So. 377, on re…
-
Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Luke, 156 Fla. 638 (Fla. 1945)…through Mr. Chief Justice CHAPMAN, said: “It is settled law in Florida that a judgment in an action at law is rendered when it is entered or recorded in the minutes of the Court,” etc., citing a number of cases. See also State v. City of Auburndale, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 698, Cates v. Hefferman, 154 Fla. 422, 18 So. (2nd) 11; and 4 C.J.S. 936. The main contention of petitioner is that the Circuit Court’s judgment of affirmance should be quashed, because the appeal from the Civil Court of Record’s judgment…
-
City of S. Miami v. State ex rel. Cary D. Landis, 140 Fla. 740 (Fla. 1939)…of them we held that delay was fatal in stated periods while in others we refused to do so. Town of Ormond v. Shaw, 50 Fla. 445, 39 So. 108; State ex rel. Davis v. City of Stuart, 97 Fla. 69, 120 So. 335; State ex rel. Landis v. City of Auburndale, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 698; State ex rel. Attorney General v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 102 Fla. 1019, 136 So. 889; Town of Boynton v. State ex rel. Davis v. City of Clear-water, 106 Fla. 761, 139 So. 377; on rehearing, 108 Fla. 635, 146 So. 836; State ex rel. Att…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Elbert Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672 (Fla. 1922)
- General Hollis v. State, 27 Fla. 387 (Fla. 1891)
- McCaskill v. State, 55 Fla. 117 (Fla. 1908)