SWAN
v.
HILL

U.S. | 1894-12-17
No. 101
155 U.S. 394 Supreme Court of the United States (1894) Caution
Also reported at: 39 L. Ed. 197 · 15 S. Ct. 178 · SCDB 1894-041 · 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2284
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice :

The Chief Justice :

The alleged bond had no obligees, and was not conditioned according to law. No application to file a sufficient bond was made. The Supreme Court of Arizona did not err in dismissing the appeal, and its judgment is

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Martin v. Clarke, 105 F.2d 685 (7th Cir. 1939)
    …to answer “all damages and costs that may be awarded” and it is insisted that such a bond does not obligate the surety to pay the amount of the judgment. In support of this argument Ætna Life Insurance Co. v. Ryan, D.C., 253 F. 457 and Swan v. Hill, 155 U.S. 394, 15 S. Ct. 178, 39 L.Ed. 197, are cited. The instant case upon the record is clearly distinguishable from the cases cited by appellee, and, consequently, are without controlling or persuasive force. The TEtna case was decided upon the authority of O…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw