LINDSAY

v.

BURGESS

Citator

Cited By

• Fredrick v. United States, 163 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1947)
  …the court can correct it forthwith and thus obviate the necessity of a new trial. Tucker v. United States, 151 U.S. 164, 170, 14 S.Ct 299, 38 L.Ed. 112; St. Clair v. United States, 154 U.S. 134, 153, 14 S.Ct. 1002, 38 L.Ed. 936; Lindsay v. Burgess, 156 U.S. 208, 210, 15 S.Ct. 355, 39 L.Ed. 399; Howland v. Beck, 9 Cir., 56 F. 2d 35, 37; Brevard Tannin Co. v. J. F. Mosser Co., 4 Cir., 288 F. 725, 730; Meadows v. United States, 4 Cir., 144 F. 2d 751, 753. We have carefully examined the judge’s charge in its…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Interstate Motor Lines, Inc. v. Great W. Ry. Co., 161 F.2d 968 (10th Cir. 1947)
  …e duty of knowing: that others may be negligent and that he must act accordingly. No objection or exception was taken to either of these instructions, and therefore the criticisms now directed against them are not open to review. Lindsay v. Burgess, 156 U.S. 208, 15 S.Ct. 355, 139 L.Ed. 399; Order of United Commercial Travelers v. Greer, 10 Cir., 43 F. 2d 499; Kitrell v. United States, 10 Cir., 79 F. 2d 259, certiorari denied, 296 U.S. 643, 56 S.Ct. 248, 80 L.Ed. 457; Scritchfield v. Kennedy, 10 Cir., 103 F…
• McCUING v. Bovay, 60 F.2d 375 (8th Cir. 1932)
  …, v. Kelley (C. C. A.) 30 F.(2d) 520; McFarland v. Central National Bank (C. C. A.) 26 F.(2d) 890; American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Karapa (C. C. A.) 173 F. 607; Landsberg v. San Francisco & P. S. S. Co. (C. C. A.) 288 F. 560; Lindsay v. Burgess, 156 U. S. 208, 15 S. Ct. 355, 39 L. Ed. 399; Smith v. Hopkins (C. C. A.) 120 F. 921; Mexico International Land Co. v. Larkin (C. C. A.) 195 F. 495; Gould & Curry Mining Co. v. Douglass (C. C. A.) 273 F. 681; Vance v. [*376] Chapman (C. C. A.) 23 F.(2d) 914; Brown…

  ← 1 / 2 →