HYDE
v.
CONTINENTAL TRUST COMPANY

U.S. | 1895-01-01
No. 894
The opinion of Mr. Justice Field was entitled in this case as well as in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company., Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Hablan dissented from the decree in this case for the reasons given in their dissenting opinions in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company.
157 U.S. 654 Supreme Court of the United States (1895) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 39 L. Ed. 845 · 15 S. Ct. 717 · 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2216 · SCDB 1894-172
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice:

The Chief Justice:

This ease differs in no essential respect from that just decided, and must be disposed of in the same way.

Decree accordingly.

The opinion of Mr. Justice Field was entitled in this case as well as in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company.

Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Hablan dissented from the decree in this case for the reasons given in their dissenting opinions in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Martis C. Scalf v. Bennett, 408 F.2d 325 (8th Cir. 1969)
    …. 2d 641, 643 (8th Cir. 1947). And the writ will not be used to test an indictment unless it is constitutionally defective. Knewel v. Egan, 268 U.S. 442, 446, 45 S.Ct. 522, 69 L.Ed. 1036 (1925) ; Bergemann v. Backer, 157 U.S. 655, 659, 15 S.Ct. 727, 39 L.Ed. 845 (1895) ; Johnson v. Beto, 383 F. 2d 197, 198 (5th Cir. 1968) ; Roth v. United States, 295 F. 2d 364, 365 (8th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 1004, 82 S.Ct. 639, 7 L.Ed.2d 543 (1962) ; Keto v. United States, 189 F. 2d 247, 251 (8th Cir. 1951). Co…
  • Bostic v. Rives, 107 F.2d 649 (D.C. Cir. 1939)
    …It is the settled rule of this Court that habeas corpus calls in question only the jurisdiction of the court whose judgment is challenged. Andrews v. Swartz, 156 U.S. 272 [15 S.Ct. 389, 39 L.Ed. 422]; Bergemann v. Backer, 157 U.S. 655 [15 S.Ct. 727, 39 L.Ed. 845]; In re Lennon, [*651] 166 U.S. 548 [17 S.Ct. 658, 41 L.Ed. 1110] ; Felts v. Murphy, 201 U.S. 123 [26 S.Ct. 366, 50 L.Ed. 689]; Valentina v. Mercer, 201 U.S. 131 [26 S.Ct. 368, 50 L.Ed. 693]; Frank v. Mangum, 237 U.S. 309 [35 S.Ct. 582, 59 L.Ed. 969…
  • United States ex rel. Elliott v. Hendricks, 213 F.2d 922 (3d Cir. 1954)
    …buya Jugiro, 1891, 140 U.S. 291, 11 S.Ct. 770, 35 L.Ed. 510; McKane v. Durston, 1894, 153 U.S. 684, 14 S.Ct. 913, 38 L.Ed. 867; Andrews v. Swartz, 1895, 156 U.S. 272, 15 S.Ct. 389, 39 L.Ed. 422; Bergemann v. Backer, 1895, 157 U.S. 655, 15 S.Ct. 727, 39 L.Ed. 845; Kohl v. Lehlback, 1895, 160 U.S. 293, 16 S.Ct. 304, 40 L.Ed. 432; Craemer v. Washington State, 1897, 168 U.S. 124, 18 S.Ct. 1, 42 L.Ed. 407; Crossley v. California, 1898, 168 U.S. 640, 18 S.Ct. 242, 42 L.Ed. 610; Storti v. Massachusetts, 1901, 183…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw