OREGON SHORT LINE AND UTAH NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
CONLIN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Oregon Short Line and Utah Northern Railway Company sought removal of a negligence suit brought by Francis Conlin for personal injuries to federal court, but the Oregon Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's denial of removal. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that removal was properly denied based on reasons previously articulated in a related case involving the same railroad company.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
MR. Justice Shiras delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon, alleging error in the judgment of that court in affirming a judgment of the circuit court of Washington County in that State, wherein Francis Conlin, the defendant in error in this court, recovered damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the Oregon Short Line and Northern Bailway Company, plaintiff in error. The only question presented for our consideration is, whether there was error in denying the petition of the defendant company for removal of the cause into the Circuit Court of the United States. The record discloses a similar state of facts and allegations to that considered in the case, just decided, of The Oregon Short Line and Northern Railway Company v. Jane Skottowe. For the reasons there given,.we find no error in the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon, and it is accordingly
Affirmed.