HURLBUT LAND AND CATTLE CO.
v.
TRUSCOTT
HURLBUT LAND AND CATTLE CO.
TRUSCOTT
165 U.S. 719
Supreme Court of the United States (1897)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Smith v. Adams, 130 U. S. 167; McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Hume v. Bowie, 148 U. S. 245; Gurnee v. Patrick County, 137 U. S. 141; Bender v. Pennsylvania Co., 148 U. S. 502.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bauman v. Ross, 167 U.S. 548 (U.S. 1897)…made to consist of such lands, and such only, as the commissioners shall decide to be benefited. Spencer v. Merchant, and Shoemaker v. United States, above cited; Fallbrook District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112, 167, 168, 175, 176; Ulman v. Baltimore, 165 U. S. 719. See also the very able opinion of the Court of Appeals of New York, delivered by Judge Buggies, in People v. Brooklyn, 4 N. Y. 419, 430. The rule of apportionment among the parcels of land benefited also rests within the discretion of the legislat…
Authorities Cited
- McLISH v. Roff, 141 U.S. 661 (U.S. 1891)
- Smith v. Adams, 130 U.S. 167 (U.S. 1889)
- Hume v. Bowie, 148 U.S. 245 (U.S. 1893)
- Bender v. Pa. Co., 148 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1893)
- Gurnee v. Patrick Cnty., 137 U.S. 141 (U.S. 1890)