VALK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Collier v. United States, 173 U.S. 79 (U.S. 1899)
  …s the Indians by whom the depredation was committed were not in amity, the court correctly, decided that it was without jurisdiction. Marks v. United States, 161 U. S. 297, followed in Leighton v. United States, 161 U. S. 291; Valk v. United States, 168 U. S. 703. This legal conclusion was not disputed in the argument at bar; [*81] but it was contended that this court will, as a matter of law,, where the record enables it to do so, determine for itself whether the ultimate facts found below are supported by…
• Thorp v. Bonnifield, 177 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1900)
  …Court of Appeals Certified the question to this court for the purpose of receiving its instruction upon the ques= tion of jurisdiction. This court answered the question in the negative, denying the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Appeals [*17]. 168 U. S. 703. The mandate from this court was duly issued,, and the Circuit Court of Appeals in conformity therewith dismissed the writ of error, and on January 4, 1898, it issued its mandate to that effect, directed to the District Court of the United States fo…

Authorities Cited

• Marks v. United States, 161 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1896)
• Leighton v. United States, 161 U.S. 291 (U.S. 1896)