DRAKE

v.

KOCHERSPERGER

Citator

Cited By

• Gully v. First Nat'l Bank in Meridian, 299 U.S. 109 (U.S. 1936)
  …suit to recover such a tax would not be one arising under the Constitution of the United States, though the bank would have the aid of the Constitution when it came to its defense. Tennessee v. Union & Planters Bank, supra; Sawyer v. Kochersperger, 170 U. S. 303; Arkansas v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co., 183 U. S. 185; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Mottley, supra. That there is a federal law permitting such taxation does not change the basis of the suit, which is still the statute of the state, though the fed…
• Arkansas v. Kan. & Tex. Coal Co. & San Francisco R.R., 183 U.S. 185 (U.S. 1901)
  …ed States, or under statutes of the United States, or of a-State, in conflict with the Constitution. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' Bank, 152 U. S. 454; Chappell v. Waterworth, 155 U. S. 102; Walker v. Collins, 167 U. S. 57; Sawyer v. Kockersperger, 170 U. S. 303; Florida Central & Peninsula Railroad v. Bell, 176 U. S. 321. [*189] In this case the State asserted no right under the Constitution or laws of the United States, and put forward ho ground of relief derived from either. There • were no averments on…
• Commercial Metals Co. v. Balfour, 577 F.2d 264 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …be one arising under the Constitution of the United States, though the bank would have the aid of the Constitution when it [*268] came to its defense. Tennessee v. Union & Planters Bank, supra; Sawyer v. Ko-chersperger, 170 U.S. 303, [18 S.Ct. 946, 42 L.Ed. 1046]; Arkansas v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co., 183 U.S. 185, [22 S.Ct. 47, 46 L.Ed. 144]; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Mottley, supra. That there is a federal law permitting such taxation does not change the basis of the suit, which is still the statute…